How to be compensated for what you like to do. At sixes and sevens? -- consider the eights, as in, to Create!
Monday, May 10, 2021
Magic in the Universe
Tuesday, October 20, 2020
A New Episode in The History of 315-321 Apartment Corp
Thank you for being part of our East Village Coop of two buildings between 1st and 2nd Avenue on historic East 12th Street, running the width of Manhattan Island from West to East.
This new episode is about the six three-story Greek Revival townhouses with the addresses 311, 313, 315, 317, 319 and 321 East 12th Street, built in 1853.
At the turn of the last century a developer, Jacob Fish, bought 5 of them.
What could they house? four families each?
Jacob Fish commissioned architect Samuel Sass to transform the houses into two 6-story tenements, completed in 1907.
Unfortunately, or rather, fortunately, Mr Fish complied with the new law for tenements, allowing space for courtyards instead of air shafts.
Our rooms are smaller but they all get light, and our common hallways are bigger than the tenements built in the 1890's.
Remember, though, he could only buy 5 lots..
So when you pass by our neighbor to the west, at 311 East 12th, you are looking at the last still standing of the row of 6 Greek Revival townhouses from 1853.
Saturday, February 15, 2020
A Night at the Opera with Ruth Bader Ginsburg - Kaiser/Roberts Clear Hor...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=11xz6J6umC0
from Quando ce ne sono nove (When There are Nine): A Night at the Opera with Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, 12th Night at The New York City Bar Association, Scene 10 song (by Peter Dizozza) with Peter Dizozza and Lawrence Mertz as Michael Kaiser and John Roberts. (Sep 04, 2013 Washingtonian: "With the Kaiser-Roberts ceremony, Ginsburg became the first Supreme Court justice to perform a same-sex marriage.") RBG Song: Of Gender Let's Be Blind (Clear Horizon) by Peter Dizozza Pianist: Dr. Nathan Brandwein Percussion: James Mussen Flute: Deborah Karpatkin
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hHMmPmswG9Q
The demo description:
On the Basis of Gender (instead of Sex) here is the studio demo of Clear Horizon, The RBG Song by Peter Dizozza Recorded by Horacio Pena Sung by Martin Ginsburg to his wife, Ruth Bader. In the Amanda Bakale RBG script this was sung by Michael Kaiser to his spouse John Roberts. Music adapted from the "Clear Horizon" piano piece. Song inspired by the book, "Chef Supreme, Martin Ginsburg" created by the Justices' spouses in memoriam. This is the June Version of the recording by Horacio Pena of a song by Peter Dizozza lyrics Of gender let's be blind. I love you for your mind. Intense, intellectual, emotion is the Connection that we find. And if I'm wonder cooking for the fam'lies of our highest court I'll look back on our great careers and how we shared in our support. We both may be strong willed. Your strong will makes me thrilled. In family and work, together we will always See us both fulfilled. And if I'm one day chef supreme and all the judges look to me I'll say that, though defined by difference, We live on common ground. As we lock our eyes we're gazring at a clear horizon. Its a Moment like the moment we were born. We begin again More than friends. A love once joined together, never torn.
Saturday, November 09, 2019
Corey Meredith plays vinyl Now That You Run from Me on $400,000 Martin L...
2019 10 31 Halloween Joker at TNC - Peter Dizozza - Mike Hill
Sunday, November 03, 2019
Friday, September 27, 2019
Today I experience activities anew
My long term job is in transition.
Letting go is hard. The feeling of investment with no return is strong.
Then I realize my thought expression; it's as I write
(I'm letting other thoughts happen while I write of prior thoughts.)
I took on "per diem" work this morning with a 50H hearing scheduled for me to appear and conduct at noon. Well, here it is noon and I'm still at court on the per diem matter, in this case before a judge with whom I've played music He's a percussionist. He's removed from the court room. He's now walking back and forth in his office.
I must say hello but a lot of good it does when I'm in a bind of overscheduling done for the money I'll receive which is not much. I'm calculating... 125 ...(1st appearance 75 + 25 each additional...)+ 85x 50H Hearings. Idiot!
(I don't have to bother thinking myself an idiot. Let others use their moments of thought about me to think that...)
At court without the other side there I could have just put in a paper to get on the list. (by waiting for my "adversary," we're nearly last with each of the hundred cases on the calendar, each getting an especially pedantic attention, providing detailed opportunities to learn and relearn almost as if the holy words of codification require repeating at every opportunity... ultimately chilling the desire to add another word.)
Ah, momentary considerations.
And tonight is an Inn of Court CLE about discrimination, avoiding it in the law office, far removed from my concern, although recent activities remind me of the nebula of its impact. This cloud upon us is fun-based in many ways... race and sexual orientation and gender...trans.... is that it? People from all over the world, unique in ways, the same in ways.
All shapes and sizes and excitements are physically based.
Where's the charge now that we are ...A Father?
Parents existing in time with a future, 'cause we're leaving behind our bodes for the body of a young'un, a young one.
Now Gerald (Lebovits) is reviewing the orange folders, tossing about, looking into them, shaking his head, accepting help from his clerk. He is of the shaved head group, also an orientation of sorts.
Now he's taken a pile. He's leaning on the witness box. There is an issue of the balding men. (theirs is the higher testosterone level. Magnificent!)
He'll sit at the conference table in front of his own bench on the dais, etc.
Eventually we will talk about the upcoming RBG show and I'll have achieved completion at 1:30PM of the 10:00AM scheduled per diem status conference.
I since learned after missing my noon and 1PM hearing commitment, that if I need to be relieved I need simply inform the per diem group.
When I noted to the per diem group that the assignment was running overtime they immediately cancelled my appearance and sent a substitute per diem attorney.
By that time (12:30) I thought I was next and said no, no I must complete this, and sent away the substitute and waited ... another hour...
As for the case itself: There was a Dr. performing the usual surgeries on a car accident victim who billed and received notice that the No-Fault insurer withheld payment until completion of EUOs (Examination Under Oath).
The EUO apparently included him but without the insurer actually scheduling his EUO. The insurer denied his payment of $12,000 for the two surgeries for failure to comply; he went before no-fault arbitration which found that the insurer's EUO notice was deficient and that they had to pay him.
During that time the insurer sued the doctor?? that's why we were in New York Supreme Court.
Several prior orders directed the doctor as defendant to appear for a deposition so rather than have the case dismissed I actually agreed he would appear...this was a very silly case... it looks like they'll get their examination...even with an arbitration order to just pay him...
now this is a matter that demands the attention of those with an obsession with the ludicrous... of which I am often one.
While this document seems objectively documented, we have yet to see whether I learn anything from it....
Perhaps worst of all is the taking of time to write this...
Monday, February 26, 2018
The Song Should Go Where No Song Has Gone Before
I know what I'm doing! And what I'm doing has a ring of upsetting the table, as if the sound of a bell could upset the table -- that I have some creative thought or new way of looking at things, and communicating that can influence an outcome, can help shape the world as it continues to reformulate. In a song you have a place to experiment. It touches upon the random when it is written without training or instruction, but even in the most formulaic formats there is chance, however, as professionals we have left as little as possible to chance.
I feel today that there is more of a fear or at least a rejection of the random because we live in an intentional world. We intend to accomplish in an age where chance is no longer thought of as having Integrity, but rather is an act of perversity, like the flip a coin fellow in the Christopher Nolan Batman movie.
But we are on firm footing in the universe. Believing that is an act of faith.
When I notate songs I wrote at an early age I see that there is order in the universe.
Sunday, January 07, 2018
Mr. Bogart was rather reasonable in his depiction of the romantic lead gone wrong, susceptible to suspicion, when his female lead, the director's wife, Gloria Graham, takes the bait (offered by the outside world).
Mr. Bogart seems to have his ego well within his control to portray these roles so completely.
I'm longing for the romantic lead movie role that allows for the actor to embody an identity worthy or capable of receiving an audience transference. This transference is the relatability of the movie star, that he or she can sustain the identity transference of the viewer. Indeed this would happen when I was younger as I became Jack Nicholson in Chinatown sustaining the romantic lead in a movie land. Mr Nicholson, with director and scriptwriter, provided a substitute identity, the way Bogart does for Woody Allen in Mr. Allen's own script, establishing himself, Mr. Allen, as the romantic lead.
I'm realizing we mentioned the Quentin Tarrantino romance inspired by Play It Again Sam (True Romance, which provides a lead of great appeal but lacking in substance. I don't know why I say that with conviction (Christian Slater is ok). I'm trying to imagine the roles that have substance in a Tarrantino movie. I feel like everyone is following the acting of Robin and the Seven Hoods, which is also quite a grim and gruesome movie of knuckleheads. And his True Romance uses Elvis Presley as the Bogart figure. Elvis is also somewhat lightweight in comparison to his viewer -- forgive me for suggesting this since I know Elvis's own movies can be amazing. (I think of Jailhouse Rock, Blue Hawaii and Viva Las Vegas). But who gets the audience identity transference? Could James Bond get it as portrayed by whomever, ie, Daniel Craig? When I first saw the newer Casino Royale I was somehow affected by the youthful appearance of the male and female leads, as if they weren't going to put up with the 1960's typecasting, but they had to. Meanwhile, the 1970's movie with Jack Nicholson and Faye Dunaway (Chinatown) offers them only a moment before they plummet to the movie's end.
Oh remember where both Mr Allen and Mr. Bogart came from. Mr. Allen was the nebish behind the scenes author and Mr. Bogart was the gangster, but they were destined for Romantic Lead! It looks like Mr. Allen wrote the lead for himself. Mr. Bogart was an egoless actor intent on working, acting, good thing since he only lived 57 years. John Huston gave him an identical Maltese Falcon script (it had been filmed in the 1930's) with a built in private eye, Sam Spade. Casablanca was the script that would teach scriptwriters how to activate the ticking bomb (ruining movies by exposing the formula?). To Have and to Have Not had a director and his wife provide an offscreen model of how the on screen actors could interact... Oh Howard Hawks, the same director, gave Humphrey Bogart a Philip Marlow role. That's the movie, The Big Sleep, with two versions, the one before realization of the appeal of Bacall, and afterward.
Create a romantic lead. Is La La Land romantic? Maira is suggesting Punch Drunk Love, while I consider Daniel Day Lewis... he can sustain this kind of audience identity transference, but he doesn't care and his main director PT Anderson, is looking to create something new, something that distances us even as our fascination grows. Robert Downey Jr. could do it with Guy Richie in the Sherlock Holmes private eye... private eyes are everything, like their counterparts, secret agents. perhaps the most we get from the quirky personality, the loner with paranoia is Humphrey Bogart, the loner with obsessive compulsion is Robert Downey.
I need someone to speak to me because I need guidance. Am I really on my own... well, we're on our own together...
Thursday, December 21, 2017
1997 Informative Essay- My Issue is "I'm Always Right." Wahproovit All Night
I'm trying to communicate coherent thoughts today like I almost did in 1997 when I attended something called "The Landmark Forum,"which was basically a good experience, by the way.
What I wrote then makes sense to me now and perhaps helps others as well, so I'm posting it here...
However, I also remember that the idea of writing my story was to dismiss it, therefore it becomes worse the more I try to clarify it...the more you fix a problem the more you prolong it...
I think people like being with a special person so I tried to be one, to get friends, but actually I never (developed close relationships) because I was never genuine. I was always different and somehow it became right to be my way. I wasn't successful except in my own mind where I was the tremendous hero of supernatural ghost stories, fantasies that compromised my happiness to show how real they could be.
(By fantasizing, I could convinced myself to believe in my own imagined successes.)
If they weren't enrolled, someone else would be there. I never planned filming prior to the moment. Something turned out and I was right to do what I wanted. No one expected anything. In fact there was no competition. I was doing what no one else was doing at the little league. I was making a movie. (reel three of The Ruins is here with the Pink Floyd sound blocked: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lhB7fT9H794&t=59s)
I was struggling against excellence in a competitive field (no sports for me... but then I remember loving everyone, all the children in the alley, playing a casual game of baseball while the sun was setting...a lovely event).
I could excel if no one else was doing it at the time. That forged the way for my doing what no one else was doing, ever, in a performance or in writing, but I got so far gone that I embarrassed myself and those around me, because my art was an expression of my emptiness, and here I drop terms like necrophilia and fixual?? ideas. (For example, my movie, The Last Dodo considers the practice of circumcision as a mark of civilization http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rliw1JVv6QA )
I was a child (of 4) when I discovered sex. I couldn't rightfully share that with anyone, and I was getting all the secrets through self-discovery. No sharing there. I was too embarrassed about it. Years later I could share it but (felt that I and my partner) were at different levels.
I've been trashed and remain here because I don't care, and succeed and don't care. How did I get to be an attorney? 'cause I'm so smart and angry, but barely able to drag myself around with these gifts and a creative mind and just being there. (Yes I'm an attorney: http://lawyers.justia.com/lawyer/peter-william-dizozza-1173507)
I want a relationship, and an active creative life. I'm just a story teller. Where do I go? What do I do?
(I like that piece, Gunshy... based on a William Saroyan short story, knife like,Knife-like, Flower-like, Like Nothing at All in the World)
This was 20 years ago....
Thursday, September 22, 2016
Friday, April 08, 2016
The Charles Busch Cleopatra
Addendum: The introductory announcement for piece, that it's a story of love, betrayal, murder...concludes its list with "eye-liner." It sounds funny but, yes, look at the eye of Horus. Eyeliner figures prominently in the symbology of Egypt.
Thursday, January 28, 2016
Saturday, January 16, 2016
Masonic
For the Shanghai of 600 years ago, go to the Yu Gardens.
And we're really straying from the topic of successful fireplace masonry.
Forget it. All the cuttings are going in there, and yet the chimney is clean (I bought and ran through it a 50' chimney sweep rod. Nothing.)...
Sunday, April 19, 2015
Thursday, January 29, 2015
What is amazing to me is my total lack of sympathy for this play, which took 3 hours to deliver. I'm sure my low level irritation arises because the subject matter cuts so close to home regarding my own work, in which audiences are challenged to find anything that concerns them.
Somehow after three hours I am at a loss to find character development in the figures parading about. Their sincerity or lack of it seems arbitrary. Somewhere buried in them are feelings, and the lead fellow's drive to not take no for an answer is somehow a show of strength and ingenuity, useless though it may be. The playwright's waste of eloquent speech to resurrect the novel, giving costumed actors the opportunity to pretend and prey upon lower realms from a godlike precipice, is completely inconsequential. Perhaps it lays a foundation for the French Revolution, but the main question after seeing what you'd be overthrowing is, why bother? Ok, there's more to consider.... Perhaps this griping goes to the merit of classical french theater, the only names coming to mind being Voltaire and Moliere, which is vaguely satirical. I remember being also annoyed by The Miser and The Hypochondriac (is that Tartuffe?). I suppose I've grown to love the Bernstein Wilbur modern day derivative of Voltaire's Candide. I may grow to love Christopher Hampton's Play, too.